<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 126 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89976</link>
    <description>Articles of heat-resistant glass used as bake and serveware, including plates, bowls and dishes, were treated as tableware glass for Notification No. 67/88 dated 01-03-1988. The Tribunal followed its earlier order in the assessee&#039;s own case, which had already held that similar items such as pizza plates, pie dishes and mixing bowls fell within the notification. On that settled basis, the exemption was held applicable to the goods, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:33:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 126 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89976</link>
      <description>Articles of heat-resistant glass used as bake and serveware, including plates, bowls and dishes, were treated as tableware glass for Notification No. 67/88 dated 01-03-1988. The Tribunal followed its earlier order in the assessee&#039;s own case, which had already held that similar items such as pizza plates, pie dishes and mixing bowls fell within the notification. On that settled basis, the exemption was held applicable to the goods, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>