<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89942</link>
    <description>A product consisting of 70% coffee and 30% chicory was classified as a preparation with a basis of coffee because coffee predominated and gave the product its essential character and taste. It was therefore held to fall under Sub-heading 2101.10 of the Central Excise Tariff, and the claim that it was a roasted coffee substitute under Sub-heading 2102.30 was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:47:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89942</link>
      <description>A product consisting of 70% coffee and 30% chicory was classified as a preparation with a basis of coffee because coffee predominated and gave the product its essential character and taste. It was therefore held to fall under Sub-heading 2101.10 of the Central Excise Tariff, and the claim that it was a roasted coffee substitute under Sub-heading 2102.30 was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>