<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 190 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89935</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit in a stay application was considered in relation to the extent of interim deposit required pending appeal. The applicants were directed to deposit part of the duty demand, and recovery of the balance was stayed subject to compliance. The stay petition was disposed of on that basis, reflecting a partial pre-deposit arrangement rather than a full waiver.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:31:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 190 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89935</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit in a stay application was considered in relation to the extent of interim deposit required pending appeal. The applicants were directed to deposit part of the duty demand, and recovery of the balance was stayed subject to compliance. The stay petition was disposed of on that basis, reflecting a partial pre-deposit arrangement rather than a full waiver.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>