https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89931 Radar level gauges imported for measuring liquid levels in tanks were held classifiable by their specific function rather than by the mere use of radar technology. The HSN Explanatory Notes showed that equipment does not fall under the radar apparatus heading simply because radar is employed as a tool within it. Because these goods were designed to measure liquid levels, the more specific heading for liquid level indicators applied, and Heading 90.26 prevailed over Heading 85.26. en-us Tue, 24 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:25:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89931 Radar level gauges imported for measuring liquid levels in tanks were held classifiable by their specific function rather than by the mere use of radar technology. The HSN Explanatory Notes showed that equipment does not fall under the radar apparatus heading simply because radar is employed as a tool within it. Because these goods were designed to measure liquid levels, the more specific heading for liquid level indicators applied, and Heading 90.26 prevailed over Heading 85.26. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 24 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89931