<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 116 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89928</link>
    <description>Brass scrap was held to fall within the deemed credit entry for &quot;copper waste and scrap&quot; under the applicable trade order. Section Note 6 to Section XV of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 treats a reference to a base metal as including its alloys unless the context otherwise requires, and the tariff wording did not limit the entry to virgin copper alone. The distinction elsewhere in the tariff between refined copper and copper alloys did not justify excluding brass scrap from this specific benefit. The consequence was that denial of deemed credit was not justified and entitlement under the entry was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:20:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 116 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89928</link>
      <description>Brass scrap was held to fall within the deemed credit entry for &quot;copper waste and scrap&quot; under the applicable trade order. Section Note 6 to Section XV of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 treats a reference to a base metal as including its alloys unless the context otherwise requires, and the tariff wording did not limit the entry to virgin copper alone. The distinction elsewhere in the tariff between refined copper and copper alloys did not justify excluding brass scrap from this specific benefit. The consequence was that denial of deemed credit was not justified and entitlement under the entry was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>