https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89920 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving the alleged unauthorized usage of power for manufacturing textiles. The Tribunal found that the evidence presented by the department, based on circumstantial evidence, was inconclusive and failed to definitively prove power usage for textile production. Emphasizing inconsistencies and lack of concrete proof, the Tribunal set aside the Collector's order, ruling that the grounds for confirming the demand were insufficient. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and appropriate relief was directed. en-us Fri, 13 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:22:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89920 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving the alleged unauthorized usage of power for manufacturing textiles. The Tribunal found that the evidence presented by the department, based on circumstantial evidence, was inconclusive and failed to definitively prove power usage for textile production. Emphasizing inconsistencies and lack of concrete proof, the Tribunal set aside the Collector's order, ruling that the grounds for confirming the demand were insufficient. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and appropriate relief was directed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89920