https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89898 Denial of rebate based on a Chemicals Examiner's report could not be sustained where the appellants had consistently contended that the sample was drawn from raw rice bran oil and not from the processed oil used in manufacture. That material factual plea had to be examined before rejecting the rebate claim, because the laboratory report alone could not e admissibility without resolving the sampling dispute. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration of the rebate entitlement after addressing the appellants' factual contention. en-us Wed, 14 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:24:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89898 Denial of rebate based on a Chemicals Examiner's report could not be sustained where the appellants had consistently contended that the sample was drawn from raw rice bran oil and not from the processed oil used in manufacture. That material factual plea had to be examined before rejecting the rebate claim, because the laboratory report alone could not e admissibility without resolving the sampling dispute. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration of the rebate entitlement after addressing the appellants' factual contention. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89898