<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89888</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value is the primary basis of customs valuation and may be rejected only if the statutory grounds under the valuation rules are proved by evidence. Here, no material showed any restriction, extra remittance, or other reason to treat the declared price as unacceptable, so recourse to a higher contemporaneous import price was not justified. A comparison with another invoice was also inadequate because the imports were in widely different quantities, whereas identical-goods comparison requires substantially the same quantity and commercial level. The declared transaction value therefore had to be accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:49:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89888</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value is the primary basis of customs valuation and may be rejected only if the statutory grounds under the valuation rules are proved by evidence. Here, no material showed any restriction, extra remittance, or other reason to treat the declared price as unacceptable, so recourse to a higher contemporaneous import price was not justified. A comparison with another invoice was also inadequate because the imports were in widely different quantities, whereas identical-goods comparison requires substantially the same quantity and commercial level. The declared transaction value therefore had to be accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>