<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 244 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89864</link>
    <description>The Tribunal considered whether a mistake apparent from the record existed in its final order and found that an error had crept into the order. It therefore allowed the rectification application, recalled the earlier final order, and directed that the matter be listed for hearing on a later date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:56:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 244 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89864</link>
      <description>The Tribunal considered whether a mistake apparent from the record existed in its final order and found that an error had crept into the order. It therefore allowed the rectification application, recalled the earlier final order, and directed that the matter be listed for hearing on a later date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>