<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89860</link>
    <description>Temporarily removing the imported engines from forklift trucks and fitting locally manufactured engines for testing and exhibition did not create a new commercially distinct product. The goods remained the same imported forklift trucks throughout, and the original parts were later restored. Because no process of manufacture resulting in a new excisable commodity was established, the activity did not amount to manufacture and no additional duty was payable on the forklift trucks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:38:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89860</link>
      <description>Temporarily removing the imported engines from forklift trucks and fitting locally manufactured engines for testing and exhibition did not create a new commercially distinct product. The goods remained the same imported forklift trucks throughout, and the original parts were later restored. Because no process of manufacture resulting in a new excisable commodity was established, the activity did not amount to manufacture and no additional duty was payable on the forklift trucks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>