<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89839</link>
    <description>Laminated particle boards cut only to specified sizes, without any special shape or design, were held not to become identifiable essential components of steel furniture. Mere cutting to size did not change their character from general-use boards into specially shaped parts, even if supplied for use as table tops. On that basis, the exemption under Notification No. 60/86-C.E. could not be denied, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 261 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89839</link>
      <description>Laminated particle boards cut only to specified sizes, without any special shape or design, were held not to become identifiable essential components of steel furniture. Mere cutting to size did not change their character from general-use boards into specially shaped parts, even if supplied for use as table tops. On that basis, the exemption under Notification No. 60/86-C.E. could not be denied, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>