<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 438 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89832</link>
    <description>Where multiple show cause notices arise from the same basic dispute, the notices should be adjudicated together by the authority competent to decide the case involving the highest duty demand. The Tribunal relied on Board circulars to treat the connected notice and the main notice as part of the same controversy, and directed fresh adjudication by the Commissioner. That fresh adjudication was to be undertaken after following the principles of natural justice, alongside the related remanded matter. The remand order was therefore not disturbed in substance, and the connected case was sent back for joint consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:52:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 438 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89832</link>
      <description>Where multiple show cause notices arise from the same basic dispute, the notices should be adjudicated together by the authority competent to decide the case involving the highest duty demand. The Tribunal relied on Board circulars to treat the connected notice and the main notice as part of the same controversy, and directed fresh adjudication by the Commissioner. That fresh adjudication was to be undertaken after following the principles of natural justice, alongside the related remanded matter. The remand order was therefore not disturbed in substance, and the connected case was sent back for joint consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>