<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 273 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89810</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the agreement clauses regarding manufacturing standards and quality control did not establish control by the foreign collaborator over the importer in the valuation of imported textile machinery parts. The clauses aimed at maintaining standards and quality but did not restrict the appellant&#039;s business decisions. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the transaction value for the imported goods under the Customs Valuation Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:57:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 273 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89810</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the agreement clauses regarding manufacturing standards and quality control did not establish control by the foreign collaborator over the importer in the valuation of imported textile machinery parts. The clauses aimed at maintaining standards and quality but did not restrict the appellant&#039;s business decisions. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the transaction value for the imported goods under the Customs Valuation Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>