<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 272 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89809</link>
    <description>Entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 140/83 depended on ownership of the trade mark at the time the benefit was claimed. The respondents had acquired the mark by deed of assignment, it was registered in their name, and the Trade Marks Registry recognised them as sole proprietor. A carton reference describing the product as a formulation of a foreign company did not amount to use of that company&#039;s brand name, and use of the same mark by another unit could not defeat the lawful owner&#039;s claim. The exemption therefore remained available and the bar against use of another person&#039;s brand name did not apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:54:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 272 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89809</link>
      <description>Entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 140/83 depended on ownership of the trade mark at the time the benefit was claimed. The respondents had acquired the mark by deed of assignment, it was registered in their name, and the Trade Marks Registry recognised them as sole proprietor. A carton reference describing the product as a formulation of a foreign company did not amount to use of that company&#039;s brand name, and use of the same mark by another unit could not defeat the lawful owner&#039;s claim. The exemption therefore remained available and the bar against use of another person&#039;s brand name did not apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>