https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89794 An adjudication order on classification could not stand where the authority failed to consider material technical evidence, affidavits, expert opinions and cited precedents, and gave no reasoned item-wise findings. That non-speaking approach was held contrary to natural justice and inadequate to support the classification conclusion. Because the dispute over the 44 items had not been properly examined on the existing record, the matter was set aside and remanded for de novo adjudication. On remand, the assessee was to be given a fair hearing, including an opportunity to respond to any technical material relied on by the authority. en-us Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:21:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89794 An adjudication order on classification could not stand where the authority failed to consider material technical evidence, affidavits, expert opinions and cited precedents, and gave no reasoned item-wise findings. That non-speaking approach was held contrary to natural justice and inadequate to support the classification conclusion. Because the dispute over the 44 items had not been properly examined on the existing record, the matter was set aside and remanded for de novo adjudication. On remand, the assessee was to be given a fair hearing, including an opportunity to respond to any technical material relied on by the authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89794