<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 403 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89764</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Calcutta allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant firm regarding Modvat credit on capital goods. The Tribunal directed that the Modvat credit should be allowed on the original copy of the invoice despite a rectifiable defect of non-endorsement by the H.O. Duty was paid on the capital goods, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 403 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89764</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Calcutta allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant firm regarding Modvat credit on capital goods. The Tribunal directed that the Modvat credit should be allowed on the original copy of the invoice despite a rectifiable defect of non-endorsement by the H.O. Duty was paid on the capital goods, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>