https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89756 A general power of attorney, without specific authority to argue the appeal, did not make Shri A.K. Thakurta an authorised representative before the Tribunal. The record showed repeated absence of a proper representative, despite an earlier adjournment and a direction to be ready on the next date. The Tribunal treated the continued inability to proceed and repeated non-appearance as dilatory conduct and held that the appeal was not being prosecuted. On that basis, it dismissed the appeal for default in appearance and for non-prosecution. en-us Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:25:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89756 A general power of attorney, without specific authority to argue the appeal, did not make Shri A.K. Thakurta an authorised representative before the Tribunal. The record showed repeated absence of a proper representative, despite an earlier adjournment and a direction to be ready on the next date. The Tribunal treated the continued inability to proceed and repeated non-appearance as dilatory conduct and held that the appeal was not being prosecuted. On that basis, it dismissed the appeal for default in appearance and for non-prosecution. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89756