<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 411 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89749</link>
    <description>A cut-to-size wooden table top fixed on a refrigerator was examined for tariff classification as a refrigerator part under Chapter Heading 84.18, or alternatively under Chapter 44 or Chapter 94. The item was found to have no role in the refrigeration process and not to answer the description of furniture specially designed as part of refrigerating equipment. The relevant Chapter Note and HSN explanatory notes indicated that only cabinets or furniture designed to receive a refrigerating unit or evaporator would fall outside Chapter 94. Classification had therefore to be tested on the item&#039;s own characteristics, and the prior order was inadequate for not identifying the correct sub-heading within the proper chapter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:10:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 411 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89749</link>
      <description>A cut-to-size wooden table top fixed on a refrigerator was examined for tariff classification as a refrigerator part under Chapter Heading 84.18, or alternatively under Chapter 44 or Chapter 94. The item was found to have no role in the refrigeration process and not to answer the description of furniture specially designed as part of refrigerating equipment. The relevant Chapter Note and HSN explanatory notes indicated that only cabinets or furniture designed to receive a refrigerating unit or evaporator would fall outside Chapter 94. Classification had therefore to be tested on the item&#039;s own characteristics, and the prior order was inadequate for not identifying the correct sub-heading within the proper chapter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>