<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 409 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89747</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on subsidiary gatepasses was held inadmissible where it was availed after the 30 June 1994 cut-off fixed by Notification No. 16/94. The temporal limit in the notification was treated as decisive, and a claimed minor irregularity could not override expiry of the prescribed period. The denial of credit was therefore upheld and the appeal rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:08:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 409 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89747</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on subsidiary gatepasses was held inadmissible where it was availed after the 30 June 1994 cut-off fixed by Notification No. 16/94. The temporal limit in the notification was treated as decisive, and a claimed minor irregularity could not override expiry of the prescribed period. The denial of credit was therefore upheld and the appeal rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>