<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 289 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89717</link>
    <description>Differential Modvat credit under Rule 57B may be availed later on the same duty-paying documents where the initial credit is undisputed and the statutory scheme does not bar staggered availment. The earlier Tribunal view treated subsequent claim of the balance credit as permissible in instalments, and rejected administrative inconvenience as a ground to deny it. A six-month period under Section 11B was treated as a reasonable benchmark for such later availment, and the same documents supported the additional credit claim. On that basis, staggered availment of admissible credit was upheld and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 289 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89717</link>
      <description>Differential Modvat credit under Rule 57B may be availed later on the same duty-paying documents where the initial credit is undisputed and the statutory scheme does not bar staggered availment. The earlier Tribunal view treated subsequent claim of the balance credit as permissible in instalments, and rejected administrative inconvenience as a ground to deny it. A six-month period under Section 11B was treated as a reasonable benchmark for such later availment, and the same documents supported the additional credit claim. On that basis, staggered availment of admissible credit was upheld and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>