<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89679</link>
    <description>Woollen pile knitted fabric was treated as a pile fabric with a cotton base and woollen pile, and Section Note 14 of Section XI was applied to uphold classification under Tariff Heading 6001.19 rather than Heading 52.05. The tumbling dry process was held not to create a new commodity and, even when carried out with power, did not amount to manufacture. On that basis, the product remained eligible for Notification No. 109/86-C.E., and the duty demand could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89679</link>
      <description>Woollen pile knitted fabric was treated as a pile fabric with a cotton base and woollen pile, and Section Note 14 of Section XI was applied to uphold classification under Tariff Heading 6001.19 rather than Heading 52.05. The tumbling dry process was held not to create a new commodity and, even when carried out with power, did not amount to manufacture. On that basis, the product remained eligible for Notification No. 109/86-C.E., and the duty demand could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>