https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89672 Disclosure of job-work activity in the classification list and related correspondence defeated the allegation of suppression. Once the department was aware of the activity, the extended limitation period could not be invoked to sustain the duty demand under the exemption framework. The demand based on suppression therefore failed, and the connected penalty under Rule 173Q also could not survive because it rested solely on the same allegation. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:36:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89672 Disclosure of job-work activity in the classification list and related correspondence defeated the allegation of suppression. Once the department was aware of the activity, the extended limitation period could not be invoked to sustain the duty demand under the exemption framework. The demand based on suppression therefore failed, and the connected penalty under Rule 173Q also could not survive because it rested solely on the same allegation. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89672