<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89667</link>
    <description>Concessional duty benefit under the relevant notification was available for copper scrap purchased from the open market because the assessee asserted that the inputs were duty paid and the record did not establish otherwise. The Revenue bore the burden of proving that the scrap was non-duty paid, but it produced no evidence or investigation report showing that the relevant inputs were clearly identifiable as non-duty paid. In the absence of such proof, denial of the notification benefit could not be sustained, and the assessee was entitled to the concession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:13:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89667</link>
      <description>Concessional duty benefit under the relevant notification was available for copper scrap purchased from the open market because the assessee asserted that the inputs were duty paid and the record did not establish otherwise. The Revenue bore the burden of proving that the scrap was non-duty paid, but it produced no evidence or investigation report showing that the relevant inputs were clearly identifiable as non-duty paid. In the absence of such proof, denial of the notification benefit could not be sustained, and the assessee was entitled to the concession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>