https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89659 The Tribunal remanded the case concerning the classification of paper under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The dispute arose over whether paper subjected to super-calendering and glazing should be classified under sub-heading 4805.90 or 4806.20. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, noting that crucial factors were overlooked by the adjudicating authority. As a result, a remand was deemed necessary to re-examine the evidence and make appropriate decisions in accordance with the law. en-us Wed, 02 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:23:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89659 The Tribunal remanded the case concerning the classification of paper under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The dispute arose over whether paper subjected to super-calendering and glazing should be classified under sub-heading 4805.90 or 4806.20. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, noting that crucial factors were overlooked by the adjudicating authority. As a result, a remand was deemed necessary to re-examine the evidence and make appropriate decisions in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89659