<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 250 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89654</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing supplementary appeals and upheld the classification of imported goods under Heading 8450.19. The valuation issue was remanded for reconsideration due to lack of comparable evidence. The violation of import policy resulted in confiscation and imposition of a redemption fine, which was upheld. The appeal was allowed for reconsideration of valuation and related aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:57:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 250 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89654</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing supplementary appeals and upheld the classification of imported goods under Heading 8450.19. The valuation issue was remanded for reconsideration due to lack of comparable evidence. The violation of import policy resulted in confiscation and imposition of a redemption fine, which was upheld. The appeal was allowed for reconsideration of valuation and related aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>