<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 248 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89652</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of end fittings should not be included in the assessable value of rubber hoses for excise duty purposes. It was determined that the fittings were optional, not integral to the hoses, and were added based on customer requests at a job worker&#039;s premises, not at the appellant&#039;s factory. As a result, the duty demand was rejected, and penalties were set aside, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:53:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 248 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89652</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of end fittings should not be included in the assessable value of rubber hoses for excise duty purposes. It was determined that the fittings were optional, not integral to the hoses, and were added based on customer requests at a job worker&#039;s premises, not at the appellant&#039;s factory. As a result, the duty demand was rejected, and penalties were set aside, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>