https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89641 An order fixing furnace capacity under Section 3A(2) of the Central Excise Act was treated as a technical capacity-fixation order and was not regarded as giving rise to a maintainable appeal in the manner contended. However, where redetermination of capacity was requested, the Commissioner was bound to consider the request under Section 3A(4) and could not refuse to undertake redetermination. The assessee was entitled to be heard before capacity was redetermined, and the authority was directed to proceed accordingly. en-us Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:18:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89641 An order fixing furnace capacity under Section 3A(2) of the Central Excise Act was treated as a technical capacity-fixation order and was not regarded as giving rise to a maintainable appeal in the manner contended. However, where redetermination of capacity was requested, the Commissioner was bound to consider the request under Section 3A(4) and could not refuse to undertake redetermination. The assessee was entitled to be heard before capacity was redetermined, and the authority was directed to proceed accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89641