https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89639 Reference to the High Court requires a question of law arising from the Tribunal's order. A challenge to the correctness of the Tribunal's conclusion or alleged non-consideration of a precedent is not referable where the precedent was not shown to have been relied upon before the Tribunal and the order did not exclude the relevant statement's admissibility or relevance. A locus objection not raised before the Tribunal also does not arise from its order. However, confiscation of seized currency causes grievance to the person from whom it was seized, supporting aggrieved-person status under the Customs Act. en-us Tue, 17 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:12:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89639 Reference to the High Court requires a question of law arising from the Tribunal's order. A challenge to the correctness of the Tribunal's conclusion or alleged non-consideration of a precedent is not referable where the precedent was not shown to have been relied upon before the Tribunal and the order did not exclude the relevant statement's admissibility or relevance. A locus objection not raised before the Tribunal also does not arise from its order. However, confiscation of seized currency causes grievance to the person from whom it was seized, supporting aggrieved-person status under the Customs Act. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89639