<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89621</link>
    <description>Unconditional stay of recovery and waiver of pre-deposit were granted in an excise duty dispute where the Tribunal accepted revenue neutrality as the ative consideration. It noted that the disputed duty demand would be offset by Modvat credit available on the applicants&#039; final dutiable chewing tobacco clearances, so the Revenue would not suffer any net loss. Relying on facts similar to an earlier stay order, the Tribunal treated the credit mechanism as sufficient basis to suspend recovery pending further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:06:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89621</link>
      <description>Unconditional stay of recovery and waiver of pre-deposit were granted in an excise duty dispute where the Tribunal accepted revenue neutrality as the ative consideration. It noted that the disputed duty demand would be offset by Modvat credit available on the applicants&#039; final dutiable chewing tobacco clearances, so the Revenue would not suffer any net loss. Relying on facts similar to an earlier stay order, the Tribunal treated the credit mechanism as sufficient basis to suspend recovery pending further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>