<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 224 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89598</link>
    <description>The appeals by Gujarat Cancer Society, Shah Diagnostic Institute, and Dr. Viral C. Shah were dismissed due to non-compliance with exemption notification conditions. However, the appeals by financial institutions Can Bank Financial Service and Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd. were allowed as duty demand against them was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:14:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 224 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89598</link>
      <description>The appeals by Gujarat Cancer Society, Shah Diagnostic Institute, and Dr. Viral C. Shah were dismissed due to non-compliance with exemption notification conditions. However, the appeals by financial institutions Can Bank Financial Service and Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd. were allowed as duty demand against them was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>