<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 216 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89590</link>
    <description>Printed catch covers and sample folders made from card material and used as covering cases for medicinal tablets were treated as classifiable goods under the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal applied earlier decisions on similar printed catch covers and held classification under sub-heading 4818.13 for 28-2-1986 to 28-2-1988 and under sub-heading 4819.12 thereafter. For the period up to 1-3-1986, no finding had been recorded on classification, and the assessee&#039;s plea of bona fide belief and non-applicability of the extended limitation period also remained undecided; those issues were remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:37:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 216 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89590</link>
      <description>Printed catch covers and sample folders made from card material and used as covering cases for medicinal tablets were treated as classifiable goods under the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal applied earlier decisions on similar printed catch covers and held classification under sub-heading 4818.13 for 28-2-1986 to 28-2-1988 and under sub-heading 4819.12 thereafter. For the period up to 1-3-1986, no finding had been recorded on classification, and the assessee&#039;s plea of bona fide belief and non-applicability of the extended limitation period also remained undecided; those issues were remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>