<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on the merits presented by the appellant regarding Corn Flour and the time limitation constraints on duty demands for both Corn Flour and Glucose-D. The issue of classification discrepancies for Glucose-D required further factual assessment due to conflicting information and the absence of specific compositional data.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:15:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on the merits presented by the appellant regarding Corn Flour and the time limitation constraints on duty demands for both Corn Flour and Glucose-D. The issue of classification discrepancies for Glucose-D required further factual assessment due to conflicting information and the absence of specific compositional data.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>