<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 197 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89571</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was admissible on invoices issued by a registered dealer where the documents were valid under proviso (g) to Rule 57G(2) and the goods were received in the factory and used in manufacture. Credit also could not be denied merely because the goods moved through a stock transfer, since Section 2(h) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 treats transfer of possession for valuable consideration as sale for this purpose. On both grounds, the credit claim was accepted in full and the disallowance was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:36:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 197 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89571</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was admissible on invoices issued by a registered dealer where the documents were valid under proviso (g) to Rule 57G(2) and the goods were received in the factory and used in manufacture. Credit also could not be denied merely because the goods moved through a stock transfer, since Section 2(h) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 treats transfer of possession for valuable consideration as sale for this purpose. On both grounds, the credit claim was accepted in full and the disallowance was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>