<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 236 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89567</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order regarding the watch movements, absolute confiscation of wrist watches, and penalties. The case was remanded for fresh orders, allowing redemption of wrist watches upon payment of a fine and reassessment of penalties. The CIF value of the wrist watches was to be determined afresh, with an opportunity for the appellants to be heard before the new order was passed. Appeals were allowed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 236 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89567</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order regarding the watch movements, absolute confiscation of wrist watches, and penalties. The case was remanded for fresh orders, allowing redemption of wrist watches upon payment of a fine and reassessment of penalties. The CIF value of the wrist watches was to be determined afresh, with an opportunity for the appellants to be heard before the new order was passed. Appeals were allowed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>