https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89563 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for further verification to determine the legitimate trade discount for the bulk buyer. The appellant, a storage battery manufacturer, argued that the substantial purchases justified the higher trade discount, emphasizing the need to differentiate between bulk purchase discounts and brand name use. The Tribunal suggested a verification exercise to establish the appropriate trade discount, considering industry practices. The case underscored the importance of accurately assessing trade discounts for bulk buyers and ensuring transparency in evaluating product values. en-us Tue, 11 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:17:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89563 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for further verification to determine the legitimate trade discount for the bulk buyer. The appellant, a storage battery manufacturer, argued that the substantial purchases justified the higher trade discount, emphasizing the need to differentiate between bulk purchase discounts and brand name use. The Tribunal suggested a verification exercise to establish the appropriate trade discount, considering industry practices. The case underscored the importance of accurately assessing trade discounts for bulk buyers and ensuring transparency in evaluating product values. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89563