<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89547</link>
    <description>Where a notification offers two exemption entries, an assessee may adopt the more beneficial option if the conditions for that entry are satisfied. One entry granted full exemption subject to the inputs being duty paid, while another allowed only partial exemption. The assessee was entitled to rely on the complete exemption entry, and the departmental challenge failed. The Commissioner (Appeals) was in accepting that an assessee can choose the exemption route that yields the greater benefit under the same notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:30:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89547</link>
      <description>Where a notification offers two exemption entries, an assessee may adopt the more beneficial option if the conditions for that entry are satisfied. One entry granted full exemption subject to the inputs being duty paid, while another allowed only partial exemption. The assessee was entitled to rely on the complete exemption entry, and the departmental challenge failed. The Commissioner (Appeals) was in accepting that an assessee can choose the exemption route that yields the greater benefit under the same notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>