<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 287 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89514</link>
    <description>Prolonged departmental delay in completing a customs inquiry and issuing a notice for cancellation made continued suspension of a Custom House Agent&#039;s licence unjustified on the facts stated. The department knew of the alleged unauthorised removal of import cargo in 1995, yet the inquiry and follow-up notice were issued only after significant delay, despite the matter being substantially investigated and the agent suffering continuing business prejudice. Although sub-letting of the licence was treated as a serious charge, the customs authorities were required to expedite the proceedings rather than maintain suspension indefinitely. The suspension order was therefore revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:14:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 287 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89514</link>
      <description>Prolonged departmental delay in completing a customs inquiry and issuing a notice for cancellation made continued suspension of a Custom House Agent&#039;s licence unjustified on the facts stated. The department knew of the alleged unauthorised removal of import cargo in 1995, yet the inquiry and follow-up notice were issued only after significant delay, despite the matter being substantially investigated and the agent suffering continuing business prejudice. Although sub-letting of the licence was treated as a serious charge, the customs authorities were required to expedite the proceedings rather than maintain suspension indefinitely. The suspension order was therefore revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>