<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 153 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89507</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the order under Section 5A(2) of the Central Excise Act should apply retrospectively to goods manufactured and cleared before its issuance. The decision was based on the interpretation that the exemption order aimed to benefit all relevant goods for the specified project, emphasizing public interest and a broad application to serve the project&#039;s purpose effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:53:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 153 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89507</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the order under Section 5A(2) of the Central Excise Act should apply retrospectively to goods manufactured and cleared before its issuance. The decision was based on the interpretation that the exemption order aimed to benefit all relevant goods for the specified project, emphasizing public interest and a broad application to serve the project&#039;s purpose effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>