<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 139 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89492</link>
    <description>Notification No. 206/63 exempted goods manufactured from specified excise duty-paid inputs and old, used re-rollable scrap; imported iron and steel bars and rods were outside its scope. Countervailing duty paid on imported inputs did not satisfy the notification&#039;s condition, so the exemption claim failed. However, the duty demand was time-barred because the show-cause notice was issued beyond the normal limitation period, alleged no suppression, and the classification list claiming exemption had been approved. The extended limitation period was therefore unavailable, and the demand could not survive despite denial of the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 139 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89492</link>
      <description>Notification No. 206/63 exempted goods manufactured from specified excise duty-paid inputs and old, used re-rollable scrap; imported iron and steel bars and rods were outside its scope. Countervailing duty paid on imported inputs did not satisfy the notification&#039;s condition, so the exemption claim failed. However, the duty demand was time-barred because the show-cause notice was issued beyond the normal limitation period, alleged no suppression, and the classification list claiming exemption had been approved. The extended limitation period was therefore unavailable, and the demand could not survive despite denial of the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>