<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 131 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89484</link>
    <description>The appellant failed to comply with legal procedures, leading to the conclusion that the liquor seized from him was intended for export to Pakistan. The evidence, including confessional statements, supported the penalty imposed on the appellant for his involvement in the smuggling operation. The Tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s role in the attempted export of the confiscated goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:17:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 131 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89484</link>
      <description>The appellant failed to comply with legal procedures, leading to the conclusion that the liquor seized from him was intended for export to Pakistan. The evidence, including confessional statements, supported the penalty imposed on the appellant for his involvement in the smuggling operation. The Tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s role in the attempted export of the confiscated goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>