<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89481</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in excise appeals concerning exemption eligibility for foot-operated pumps. The Tribunal found that the appellants had shown a strong prima facie case, relying on the proposition that exemption is not denied merely because the unit did not itself clear the goods. On that basis, interim protection was allowed pending final hearing of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89481</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in excise appeals concerning exemption eligibility for foot-operated pumps. The Tribunal found that the appellants had shown a strong prima facie case, relying on the proposition that exemption is not denied merely because the unit did not itself clear the goods. On that basis, interim protection was allowed pending final hearing of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>