<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 217 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Ullage Survey Report is the primary document for determining the quantity of goods imported. It upheld the Orders-in-Appeal, confirming the amount demanded by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the use of the Ullage Survey Report for both the imposition of penalties under Section 116 and the levy of duty under Section 12 of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:55:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 217 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Ullage Survey Report is the primary document for determining the quantity of goods imported. It upheld the Orders-in-Appeal, confirming the amount demanded by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the use of the Ullage Survey Report for both the imposition of penalties under Section 116 and the levy of duty under Section 12 of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>