<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 213 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89472</link>
    <description>Delay of three days in depositing the pre-deposit under Section 35F was treated as curable, as the authority could have extended time and condoned the delay. Where the appeal was disposed of long after compliance, dismissal on that ground was held to have caused failure of justice. The dismissal was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration on merits after granting the appellant an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 213 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89472</link>
      <description>Delay of three days in depositing the pre-deposit under Section 35F was treated as curable, as the authority could have extended time and condoned the delay. Where the appeal was disposed of long after compliance, dismissal on that ground was held to have caused failure of justice. The dismissal was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration on merits after granting the appellant an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>