<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 192 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89451</link>
    <description>The refined vegetable oils were held to be excisable under sub-heading 1503.10, confirming the levy of excise duty. The majority opinion emphasized that the processes mentioned in the tariff heading included in the refined oils, making them excisable. The dissenting Member (Judicial) disagreed, stating that the refining process did not amount to manufacturing and criticized the lower authorities for not following established legal principles. Ultimately, the appeals were rejected based on the majority opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:27:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 192 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89451</link>
      <description>The refined vegetable oils were held to be excisable under sub-heading 1503.10, confirming the levy of excise duty. The majority opinion emphasized that the processes mentioned in the tariff heading included in the refined oils, making them excisable. The dissenting Member (Judicial) disagreed, stating that the refining process did not amount to manufacturing and criticized the lower authorities for not following established legal principles. Ultimately, the appeals were rejected based on the majority opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>