<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 191 - CEGAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89449</link>
    <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied where the duty-paid character of inputs is undisputed and the only objection is that the invoice-issuing dealer was not registered under Rule 57GG, because dealer registration is a procedural requirement rather than a substantive condition. Transitional notifications and the Board&#039;s circular were aimed at easing implementation, and the dealer&#039;s failure to register within the extended period could not be attributed to the user of the inputs. In the absence of any allegation of non-duty-paid or clandestinely removed goods, denial of credit on that ground was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 191 - CEGAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89449</link>
      <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied where the duty-paid character of inputs is undisputed and the only objection is that the invoice-issuing dealer was not registered under Rule 57GG, because dealer registration is a procedural requirement rather than a substantive condition. Transitional notifications and the Board&#039;s circular were aimed at easing implementation, and the dealer&#039;s failure to register within the extended period could not be attributed to the user of the inputs. In the absence of any allegation of non-duty-paid or clandestinely removed goods, denial of credit on that ground was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>