<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89422</link>
    <description>Goods classified under Heading 84.14 as centrifugal booster fans and exhaust hoods were held not to fall within the exclusion in Notification No. 175/86-C.E. because that exclusion applied to refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery, and to parts or accessories thereof under the specified chapters. Since Heading 84.14 covered fans and hoods, not refrigerating or air-conditioning machinery, the goods remained eligible for the notification benefit. The fact that the goods may be used in connection with air-conditioning equipment did not by itself attract the exclusion. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:11:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89422</link>
      <description>Goods classified under Heading 84.14 as centrifugal booster fans and exhaust hoods were held not to fall within the exclusion in Notification No. 175/86-C.E. because that exclusion applied to refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery, and to parts or accessories thereof under the specified chapters. Since Heading 84.14 covered fans and hoods, not refrigerating or air-conditioning machinery, the goods remained eligible for the notification benefit. The fact that the goods may be used in connection with air-conditioning equipment did not by itself attract the exclusion. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>