<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 142 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89411</link>
    <description>Grinding wheels and honing sticks used in the manufacturing process were treated as eligible Modvat inputs under Rule 57A because the expression &quot;in or in relation to&quot; was construed broadly. The Tribunal followed its earlier larger bench and coordinate bench decisions, holding that items integrally connected with manufacture can qualify for credit. On that basis, Modvat credit was allowed on the disputed items and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 142 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89411</link>
      <description>Grinding wheels and honing sticks used in the manufacturing process were treated as eligible Modvat inputs under Rule 57A because the expression &quot;in or in relation to&quot; was construed broadly. The Tribunal followed its earlier larger bench and coordinate bench decisions, holding that items integrally connected with manufacture can qualify for credit. On that basis, Modvat credit was allowed on the disputed items and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>