https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89404 A rectification request under the Central Excise Rules challenged the Tribunal's earlier order on the ground that it referred to an earlier decision not cited by either party. The Tribunal held that reliance on a relevant prior decision already noticed and discussed in the order did not amount to a mistake apparent from the record. As the issue had been considered in the context of Rule 57F and credit under Rule 57A, no rectifiable error was shown. The rectification application was therefore not maintainable on the ground urged and was rejected. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:22:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89404 A rectification request under the Central Excise Rules challenged the Tribunal's earlier order on the ground that it referred to an earlier decision not cited by either party. The Tribunal held that reliance on a relevant prior decision already noticed and discussed in the order did not amount to a mistake apparent from the record. As the issue had been considered in the context of Rule 57F and credit under Rule 57A, no rectifiable error was shown. The rectification application was therefore not maintainable on the ground urged and was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89404