<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 120 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89389</link>
    <description>Where invoice wording is disputed, exemption eligibility should be determined by reading the invoice with contemporaneous and collateral documents for the entire import transaction, rather than relying on invoice description alone. The Tribunal noted that the purchase order, proforma invoice, packing list, supplier clarification and the five airways bills were relevant to ascertain whether the imports comprised five complete local exchanges or only parts of a telephone exchange. The matter was therefore remanded for de novo adjudication so that all five refund claims could be examined together under Notification No. 59/88-Cus.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:42:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 120 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89389</link>
      <description>Where invoice wording is disputed, exemption eligibility should be determined by reading the invoice with contemporaneous and collateral documents for the entire import transaction, rather than relying on invoice description alone. The Tribunal noted that the purchase order, proforma invoice, packing list, supplier clarification and the five airways bills were relevant to ascertain whether the imports comprised five complete local exchanges or only parts of a telephone exchange. The matter was therefore remanded for de novo adjudication so that all five refund claims could be examined together under Notification No. 59/88-Cus.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>