<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 114 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89383</link>
    <description>A show cause notice may combine classification and valuation objections for different periods if the allegations are clearly stated. A superior excise officer may validly adjudicate reclassification and demand, so the Additional Collector was not without jurisdiction. Goods consisting mainly of gears, gear boxes, shafts, pulleys, wheels and bearings were held classifiable under Heading 84.83 under Section XVI Note 2(a), and an approved classification list could be reopened to correct the error. Technical know-how charges with a direct nexus to manufacture were includible in assessable value, and non-disclosure of such charges amounted to suppression justifying the extended limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:37:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 114 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89383</link>
      <description>A show cause notice may combine classification and valuation objections for different periods if the allegations are clearly stated. A superior excise officer may validly adjudicate reclassification and demand, so the Additional Collector was not without jurisdiction. Goods consisting mainly of gears, gear boxes, shafts, pulleys, wheels and bearings were held classifiable under Heading 84.83 under Section XVI Note 2(a), and an approved classification list could be reopened to correct the error. Technical know-how charges with a direct nexus to manufacture were includible in assessable value, and non-disclosure of such charges amounted to suppression justifying the extended limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>